About the Case

When Communities Lead, Change Follows

Community advocates in Louisiana v. Callais represent Black voters across the state who have been fighting for fair representation for years. Their voices and votes matter.

The Louisiana v. Callais case is a legal challenge concerning the state’s congressional redistricting map and its compliance with the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Following the 2020 Census, Louisiana lawmakers were ordered to create a second majority-Black congressional district to ensure fair representation for Black voters, who make up nearly one-third of the state’s population. However, after the legislature passed a revised map with two majority-Black districts, a group of white voters filed a lawsuit, arguing that the map constituted unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.

In April 2024, a federal three-judge panel ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, stating that race was the predominant factor in the redistricting process, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision challenges the balance between ensuring fair representation for Black voters under the VRA and avoiding racial gerrymandering claims. The case is expected to have significant implications for redistricting efforts nationwide, as courts determine how states can legally consider race in drawing electoral districts.

Timeline

2022

Louisiana’s Legislature refuses to draw a fair congressional map.

2023

The Supreme Court rules in favor of Black voters in Alabama, affirming the need for fair maps.

2024

Louisiana lawmakers pass a new map with two majority-Black districts, but it is challenged in court.

2025

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide the future of Louisiana’s representation on March 24, 2025.